Yogendra Yadav told the Supreme Court on Tuesday, August 12, that Sir practice is the first in the history of India where the electoral role has been amended with zero additions.

He said, “They (ECIs) have gone across the state and could not add a single connectivity … We are looking at the biggest practice of disintegration in the history of the world: 65 million names were removed. It has never been in India’s history. This figure is obliged to cross 1 crore,” he said, A.A. Bar and bench Report.

He also said in court along with 2 voters declared dead by ECI.

Activists and political commentator, who helped prepare the arguments submitted by the petitioners, who have challenged procedural flaws in special intensive amendment exercises being conducted by the Election Commission of India, physically present in the court to assist the legal team before taking permission to submit their submission in the court.

The educational, columnist and worker expressed gratitude to the bench of the Supreme Court of Judicial Surya Kant and Justice Joylya Bagchi, so that he allows him to submission to court – “That too beyond the general court hours”.

Regarding the special intensive amendment (sir) of the electoral rolls, he posted on X and said, “It is not about the amendment of the voter list in a state, but is about reducing the universality of adult franchise. Sir is a tectonic change in the architecture of democracy, which is the biggest practice in disruption in any democracy.”

“This is the first amendment practice across the country where there is zero addition and there are only omissions. The EC officers left home from home.

He also brought two people with him, who were declared dead by ECI and after the first phase published on 1 August, the Bihar was removed from the Bihar electoral role during the Sir practice.

“Please look at them. They are declared dead … but they are alive … see them,” he urged the bench, who was seen for senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, ECI, called ‘drama’.

However, Justice Bagchi replied that Yadav’s points were well taken. “There may be an unintentional error. This can be corrected. But your points are taken well,” he said.

However, there are many more qualified voters, which have been left in the state similarly, Yadav accused.

He also stated that the process does not leave enough time to appeal against such errors. On September 30, the list will be frozen, they noted. As long as the appeal is filed, the assembly elections will be notified. So even candidates can be left out of the list – and no support can be left further. Yadav warned, “This is the best way to leave any candidate from the competition.”

Large -scale disintegration has taken place, arguing, with a boycott of 65 million voters. He claimed that the exclusion is not a failure for the implementation of SIR, but the process is very design.

“With a stroke, the percentage of adults eligible to vote in Bihar has already reduced by 88 percent. There will be more deletion,” he said.

Stating that 8 crore 18 lakh Bihar has an adult population, as is estimated by the Government of India, he argued that a ‘good’ electoral role for Bihar should have 8.18 lakh voters, hence – complete adult franchise. Instead, there is already a shortage of 29 lakhs, he told.

Sir exercise should have been included, adult population should not exclude, he said.

There are also concerns, they told the court around the boycott of specific socio-economic groups. The number of deleted female voters deleted exceeds the number of deleted male voters – yet mortality in women does not exceed men; And most migrant workers are male. Therefore, high percentage of deletion in women was surprising, he said.

Election Commission lawyer Rakesh Dwivedi estimated that the month of August was nominated to correct any mistakes and Yadav should help both voters back to the role.

Justice Bagchi said that he believes that there was an opportunity to exclude those who had the opportunity to apply to re -list the role.