Connect with us

National News

Nine myths and a bitter truth

Published

on

You have not seen a more brazen attempt to separate Indian citizens than ‘nationwide’ special intense ‘ Amendment of voter roll ‘ The Election Commission of India (ECI) has started in Bihar. It is being sold as a completely clean of voter rolls-which begins with Bihar to operate nationwide-but anything. To make things worse, there are all kinds of myths and misconceptions in vogue about exercise – nine when I last counted. I will add these a bitter truth to shut down the list of 10 things about these most satanic practice.

Myth #1

<The Election Commission is doing an intense amendment and ‘reform’ of the voter role of Bihar,

Investigation of facts. This is not a revision of the existing voter list. The old list is being fully scraped, and a new voter roll is being prepared from scratch.

 Myth #2

<There is nothing new about this amendment practice – it has been done before>

Investigation of facts. Absolutely not. This time what is happening is unprecedented. After digitizing the voter lists, the need to prepare them from scratch went away. This is the first such example in 22 years. Anytime before this, the voter was placed to get his name in the list. Earlier, voters have not been asked to submit documents to prove their citizenship. A new list was never prepared before the election.

Myth #3

< Bihar voter rolls were particularly flawed, so this was to be done,

Investigation of facts. Wrong. Six months ago, Bihar’s voter list had a full -scale amendment. Millions of names were added and removed. The revised list was published in January. No major complaints of irregularities were increased. The minor errors were already being addressed through the ongoing update. If all needed, another amendment could be made. There was neither demand nor a real need to junk and start the entire list.

Myth #4

<Those whose names were in the 2003 voter list will not need to do anything,

Investigation of facts. wrong again. Everyone has to fill a new form. In the January 2025 list, whose names, father’s names and addresses will be spared to present the date of birth and birthplace in the 2003 voter list. But even these people will need to fill the form, attach a picture and signature, and a photocopy of the page from the 2003 list that shows their name.

Myth #5

<Documents will be sought only from those whose citizenship is in doubt,

Investigation of facts. This is wrong. Anyone whose name did not appear in the 2003 list will have to submit documents with new form.

§ People born before 1 July 1987 should present proof of their date and place of birth

§ People born between 1 July 1987 and 2 December 2004 must either offer evidence for themselves or for a parents

§ People born after 2 December 2004 will have to submit documents for both themselves and parents. If the parents’ names appear in the 2003 list, then a photocopy of that page would be sufficient as evidence for them-but the applicant will still have to provide documents related to birth.

Myth #6

<The Election Commission has provided several options for evidence of citizenship – certainly something will happen in every household,

Investigation of facts. Documents people generally produce as proof of ID – Aadhaar card, ration card, Election Commission’s own voter ID card, job card will not be accepted under MNREGA. ECI lists out of 11 acceptable documents, many do not apply There are rarely available for Bihar or rarely. For example: passports (which are only 2.4%), birth certificate (2.8%), government employee or pensioner ID (5%), caste certificate (16%) – are not available in ordinary homes. It leaves the school-mixing or degree certificate-is available with less than half of Bihar.

Myth #7

<नियम सभी के लिए समान हैं - कोई भेदभाव नहीं>

Investigation of facts. He is on paper. In practice, rules are loaded against people who had limited access to education. outcome? Women, poor, migrant workers, Dalits, tribal and backward communities will have a real fight on their hands to produce necessary documents – and to lose their vote. Education is effectively becoming a precondition for citizenship.

Myth #8

<The Election Commission has given three months – there is enough time to include everyone,

Investigation of facts. The real window is just one month – till 25 July. The remaining two months are for objections and internal paperwork of ECI. Within a month, ECI hopes that all booth-level officers (of 20,000 have not been appointed yet) will be trained; Party agents will also be trained; New forms will reach every house; Every person will fill his form; Necessary documents will be attached; Filled forms will be collected from every house; The data will be uploaded and its verification will begin!

Anyone whose form has not been submitted by 25 July will not come in the voter list. Duration.

Myth #9

<यह संशोधन बांग्लादेशी घुसपैठियों की समस्या को ठीक करेगा>

Investigation of facts. If Bihar has a problem with illegal foreign nationals, it is not mainly Bangladeshi Muslim – it is primarily Nepali migrants in the Terrai region, most of whom are Hindus. It is possible that amendment exercise will purify the voter rolls of a few thousand Bangladeshis and tens of thousands of Nepalis. But in this process, Indian citizens may lose the right to vote for an estimated Rs 2.5 crore. You do not swat a fly with a sledaimmer.

#the bitter truth

Bihar has a population of about 13 crores. Of these, there are about 8 crore adults who should be in the voter list. But there were only 3 crores in the 2003 list. The remaining 5 crore will now have to submit documents to prove their citizenship. At least half of them – about 2.5 crore people – are not documents of demand for ECI. Which means that it can still take away the only right to the last person in the ‘Special Intensive Amendment’ line – the right to vote.

Indians still have scary memories of ‘”Demonetisation‘(Demonetisation of November 2016) and “Landlord(March 2020’s Kovid Lockdown). Are we witness now ‘Vote ban‘, A large -scale dissolution of Indian citizens?

,Translated with permission from Hindi origin,

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National News

Siddaramaiah, Annie Raja joined Rahul-Tajshvi’s visit and called to protect democracy

Published

on

He said, “The Narendra Modi government has been caught stealing votes with the help of the Election Commission, which is why BJP leaders have started jumping up and down. This is just the beginning,” he told The Cheering Crowd.

“BJP is shaken and its leaders are irritable. We will expose them in future. No matter what Narendra Modi does … we will not allow votes to vote Theft In Bihar, “Gandhi said.

He further claimed that after the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, 1 crore fake voters were added to the rolls in Maharashtra, calling it a “proven fact”. He also alleged that the deletion into Bihar’s draft roles had targeted the rich and targeted Dalits, backward classes, poor and minorities.

Gandhi said, “Voting is the right of Dalits, minorities, women, but the Modi government has stolen votes to win the election.” “Now, people have started voting for BJP leaders Thief (Thief).”

Yadav, who has emerged as Gandhi’s prominent ally in the campaign, resonated the criticism of the Congress leader. Tejashvi said, “The people of Bihar will teach him a lesson in the upcoming assembly elections. They have been completely exposed.

The yatra also paid tribute to the political legacy of the state. In Gopalganj, Gandhi visited Phulwaria village of RJD supremo and Tejashvi’s father Lalu Prasad Yadav. He hit the statue of Lalu’s mother Marachiya Devi in ​​a gesture, which added the current movement to the rights of voting with long -running conflicts for Social Justice of Behar.

The performance of solidarity is beyond the Congress and the RJD. Annie Raja of the Communist Party of India, who contested against Gandhi in Wayanad during the 2024 general elections, joined the march in West Champaran.

Continue Reading

National News

When the secrets are pure – until you are Abhisar Sharma

Published

on

So, here is the latest spin from the political carnival: Abhishar Sharma, a YouTuber-Journalist and a major national news channel popular former news langar (who thanks BBC He is now a proud subject of a cedar in Assam to dub it “major” and critical), after he was filed, he questioned the allocation of 3,000 acres of tribal land to a private company – a fact that was stagnant High Court judge Hearing the matter – and suggested that the state and its Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma were involved in communal politics.

Sharma’s remarks were already based on the information available in the public domain, mainly CM’s own comments, but when do the facts come in the way of a good cedar? Sharma has received temporary recurrence from the Supreme Court, but has not dismissed the allegations.

But wait – Daman’s performance was a supportive task in art. BJP MPs Nishikant Dubey, who decided for oblivion, is very close, and thus it has been clearly leaked that Sharma’s income tax returns appear on social media – easely indicating that as soon as Sharma started moving on the streets and misbehaved with Modi/BJP, his income was again increased by Rs 1.2 lakh before the rupee. The context is, of course, for Sharma’s anti -BJP stance.

Confidential tax details, finally, reading bus weekends for MPs, not data protected by privacy laws under India’s Income Tax or Information Technology Acts. Who cares, isn’t it? As it happens, ordinary people to do Care. For evidence, read the comments under Dubey’s post.

Sharma announced that he was filing his own FIR-and tagged the Income Tax Department and Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitarman to ask: Whose desk (or shared USB drive) got this MP access to the top-patched ITR data?

Continue Reading

National News

Center cannot challenge Governor’s works under State Article 32: Center to Center: Center

Published

on

The Central Government on Thursday informed the Supreme Court that the state governments cannot use writ jurisdiction to challenge the work done by the President or a governor belonging to the bills passed by the state assemblies, even if such action allegedly violates fundamental rights.

Representing the Center, during the hearing before the five-judge Constitution Bench, led by Chief Justice Bra Gavai, Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, the President demanded the opinion of the apex court whether the state could file a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution based on violation of fundamental rights.

He further stated that the President wants to understand the interpretation of Article 361, which gives the President and the governors immunity to be responsible for the courts to perform their official duties.

Addressing the bench – also included as Justice Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha and Chandurkar – Mehta said that although these issues were considered during internal discussions, the President gives a certain verdict from the court, especially when similar questions can be revealed in future.

Mehta said that a Article 32 petition cannot be made against the functions of the state president or governors, stating that no direction cannot be issued to these constitutional authorities.

“Article 32 lies when the constitutional plan leads to fundamental rights and state government violations, it is not a fundamental right in itself. It is a store of tasks to protect the fundamental rights of its people,” said Mehta.

Continue Reading

Trending