The following President’s questions are:

* What are the constitutional options before a Governor when a bill is introduced under Article 200 of the Constitution of India?

* Is the Governor bound by the help and advice of the Council of Ministers, using all the options available with them when a bill is presented to them under Article 200 of the Constitution of India?

* Is the practice of constitutional discretion by the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India?

* Article 361 of the Constitution of India is a full bar to review judicially in relation to the functions of the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India?

* In a constitutionally prescribed time frame and absence of methods of practicing powers by the Governor, can the time -limit be imposed and the governor is determined by the Governor through judicial orders for the practice of all powers under Article 200 of the Constitution of India?

* Is the practice of constitutional discretion by the President justified under Article 201 of the Constitution of India?

* In a constitutionally prescribed timeline and absence of the method of practice by the President, can the deadline be imposed and under Article 201 of the Constitution of India, the President’s method of exercise through judicial orders for the practice of conscience is determined by the President?

* In the light of the Constitutional Plan that controls the powers of the President, the President needs to consult the Supreme Court through a reference under Article 143 of the Constitution of India and the Governor reserves the Bill for the consent of the President or otherwise?

* Are the Governor and President’s decisions respectively under Article 200 of the Constitution of India and Article 201, respectively, a platform in the law coming under the law is justified in the past? Is it acceptable for the courts to judge the content of a bill, in any way, before the law is enacted?

* Can constitutional powers and orders of the President/Governor/the orders be replaced in any way under Article 142 of the Constitution of India?

* Has a law implemented by the State Legislature without the assurance of the Governor given under Article 200 of the Constitution of India?

* In view of provisions for Article 145 (3) of the Constitution of India, is it not mandatory for any bench of this court to decide whether there is a question involved in the proceedings before such nature which includes sufficient questions of law as the interpretation of the Constitution and to refer to a minimum five judges to refer to a bench of five judges?

* … (are) The powers of the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India are limited to procedural law or matters of Article 142 of the Constitution of India, which are spread to issue direction/passing orders, which are inconsistent with the current original or procedural provisions of the Constitution or law?

* Does the Constitution stop any other jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to resolve disputes between the Central Government and the State Governments through a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India?

The April 8 decision of the Supreme Court set a time -line for all the governors to work on the bills passed by the state assemblies and ruled that the Governor has not made any discretion in the practice of works under Article 200 of the Constitution, which is in relation to any bill presented to them and must compulsorily follow by advice given by the councils.

It states that the state governments can directly contact the Supreme Court if the President sent the bill sent by the Governor for consideration.

Justice JB Pardwala and R. A bench in Mahadevan stated that “the governor’s personal dissatisfaction, political campaign or any other external or irrelevant views” reserved a bill on the basis of the constitution, strictly impregnable by the constitution and would be liable to set separately on that ground alone.