Connect with us

National News

TMC, BJP in fresh face-off in custody of Bengali speakers

Published

on

The TMC (Trinamool Congress) on Friday accused the BJP of spreading lies and criminalizing poverty in the custody of Bengali speaking migrant workers in Odisha, while Saffron Party accused Mamata Banerjee Dispensation to provide shelter to illegal immigrants.

After Sameerul Islam, Chairman of TMC MP and welfare board of migrant workers, political slugfest increased, launched a stinging countertack on BJP It Cell head Amit Malviya, in which he was branded “false master”.

The TMC MP demanded evidence of Malavia’s claims that out of 444 migrants in Odisha, 335 had allegedly issued by the West Bengal government with fake documents. Hitting Malavia, Islam accused him of pedaling “fake claims” after Islam jerked in the Calcutta High Court.

Responding to Malavia’s allegations, Islam questioned why the BJP -led Odisha government released most of the detainees if they were truly Bangladeshi. He demanded evidence that the captives were foreigners and asked if such documents were ever put before the court or whether there was any exile.

He said, “Even the BSF admitted that it was his mistake to illegally deport seven innocent Bengalis,” he said, rejecting the identity documents released in Bengal reveals an “anti -Bengali” bias within the BJP.

Islam further alleged that Malavia did not even understand that Aadhaar and voter ID cards were documents issued by the central government and not by the state.

“You are asking other states to reject the documents issued by Bengal. It clearly shows how the Bengali and bias is issued by the state governments. Aadhaar or epic (voter ID)?

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National News

Ex-TN CM O. Panneerselvam Snaps with NDA

Published

on

Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu O. AIADMK Cadres Rights Rights RETRIVAL Committy, led by Pannerasalavam, went out of the BJP -led NDA alliance on Thursday. An experienced leader and committee advisor Panrauti S. Ramachandran announced the decision.

Talking to reporters, Flranged by Ramachandran, Panneraselvam and panel leaders said: “Next, the committee will not be part of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA).”

The decision to move away from NDA was unanimous, he said while answering a question. The committee will soon start a tour of several parts of Tamil Nadu, by the committee, it will soon start visiting several parts of Tamil Nadu and it has been resolved to decide on the question of future coalition according to political circumstances.

Asked about the reasons for leaving the NDA, Ramachandran said that the reason for this was widely known and there was no need to convince it. He expressed confidence that “a correct coalition to lead people in the right direction would be physical in the future”.

Asked if the BJP cheated the Panneerslavam -led panel, Ramachandran said that he does not need to tell what the BJP did to the committee because the nation knows it.

For a question, Pannerasalavam said that he met Stalin in Chennai during his morning walk and proceeded after expressing his pleasures.

Amidst speculation about their next step, when Pannaruselvam strongly condemned the Union Government on 29 July, to not release the ‘Samagra Shikha’ fund to Tamil Nadu, it became clear that he was preparing to go out of the NDA.

Continue Reading

National News

Will Modi be silent on Trump’s comments on India, asks Kharge

Published

on

Kharge said that the US President has given the reason for tariffs in India as India’s oil imports from Russia, purchasing arms from Russia, BRICS membership of India and so -called attacks of BRICS on US dollars.

The Congress president claimed that this is a serious shock to India’s national policy of “strategic autonomy”.

He said, “History is witness that non-composition is the foundation of our foreign policy. All governments, despite the parties in power, strengthen friendship with various countries around the world in India’s interest,” he said.

During the UPA government, as Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh gave India a nuclear exemption from 45 countries including the US, Kharge told.

“America supported us. For this, they changed their law. But India was not obliged to take nuclear fuel and material only from the US. Our options were open. Your government’s foreign policy has given a serious blow to that national policy,” he said.

Trump is talking about making a deal with Pakistan on oil reserves and “threatening India”, Kharge said, and asked why PM was “silent sitting”.

“We are worried about this new America -Chhina -Pakistan Axis. Instead of worrying about PR, the Modi government should think about the country,” Kharge said.

Continue Reading

National News

who is responsible? Asks the organization helping the victims

Published

on

Talking to PTI, Feroz Ahmed Azmi, in-charge of the total Jamaat-e-Tanjeem organization, said, “The court’s decision in the Malegaon blast case has shocked us, because those who died did not get justice.”

After the 2006 bomb blasts in Malegaon, we always demanded that agencies work in the right direction, after the 2008 explosion, the then anti -Maharashtra anti -terrorism squad (ATS) chief Hemant Karkare conducted a proper investigation and a case was set up against these accused. He provided all the evidence against him, he said.

“We were happy because the investigation was moving in the right direction. The agencies were working for the last 17 years, so they must have found strong evidence. But the court gave a verdict that has shocked us,” Azmi said.

He said, “Those who were killed in the explosion did not get justice, if these people were not responsible for the Malegaon blast, who were involved? The agencies should move forward and contact the Supreme Court against this decision.

In the order passed by Special Judge AK Lahoti, handed over to listen to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) cases, several flaws were flagged off and investigated in the prosecution case, and said that the accused persons are entitled to the benefits of doubt.

Continue Reading

Trending