Connect with us

National News

HC rejected the demand for the use of ‘disputed structure’ in place of ‘Shahi Idgah Mosque’

Published

on

The Hindu side has filed 18 suits for the removal of the structure of the royal Idgah mosque as well as the restoration of the temple and for permanent prohibition.

Earlier, on 1 August 2024, on a platform, the High Court had rejected the applications of the Muslim side, challenging the structure of the suits of Hindu worshipers and said that all the suits of Hindu worshipers are worth maintaining.

In the order of 1 August, the court also admitted that these suits have not been stopped by the locations of the Border Act, Waqf Act and Ways Act, 1991, which prevents the conversion of any religious structure on 15 August 1947.

In another phase, on 23 October 2024, the High Court rejected an application by the royal Idgah Mosque Committee to recall the High Court order of 11 January 2024, which consolidates all the suits filed in connection with the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute in Mathura.

The dispute belongs to the mosque of Aurangzeb-era, which was built after demolishing a temple at the birthplace of Lord Krishna.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National News

Rabri Devi says, refuse to show their documents to EC officials

Published

on

Former Chief Minister Rabri Devi asked the people of Bihar to “denies” to show any document other than their voter ID card on Saturday 5 July, when the poll officials were running. Special intensive amendment of electoral rolls In the state.

Rabri Devi came with this suggestion during her brief address at the National Council meeting of Rashtriya Janata Dal to mark the day of her 28th Foundation.

He said, “People from all over the state are present here. I advise them not to see any documents other than their voter ID card. Refuse to ask to do so,” he said.

Rabri Devi said that the demand for submission of new documents is unfair. “Officials want people to show their parents’ birth certificates. A person who will lose all his family members for a long time, can come up with such evidence of identity?” Asked the Leader of the Opposition in the State Legislative Council.

Rabri Devi said, “Governments at the Center and the state have kept the country for sale. They have now conspired to deprive the poor with their polling rights along with the Bihar assembly elections.”

Continue Reading

National News

Indo-American trade talks hit the crossroads

Published

on

This strategic recurrence comes when the US proceeds to extended access to Indian markets under Trump – especially for American agricultural products, automobiles and industrial goods. Meanwhile, India is pressurizing its own exports for better entry for tariff concessions and areas such as textiles, gems and seafood.

The trend of India has already begun to appear in a tangible manner. Now the “mutual tariff” threatened by the US is not just a material with disregarding the “mutual tariff”, India is now searching for the option to implement the “anti -anti -retardation”.

A clear indication of this change recently came to the World Trade Organization, where India proposed retaliatory duties against the US in response to the new American tariff. Effective May 3, the US imposed a 25 percent advertisement on the import of passenger vehicles, light trucks and some auto parts in India – a move that India is now preparing to counter.

Complaining cases further is a change in tone from President Trump. After emphasizing the first July deadline, he now talks about the date of implementation of August 1 for the new tariff regime. This shifting timeline has already introduced fresh uncertainty in an atmosphere of stressful interactions.

Trump said in an agency report, “My inclination is to send a letter and say what the tariffs are going to pay.” “We have more than 170 countries. And you can do good deals – but they are very complicated.”

Continue Reading

National News

Hamas sent a ‘positive’ response to the proposal, so where is the ceasefire?

Published

on

Hamas said on 4 July, Friday, that he had given a “positive” response to the latest proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza, but said further interactions were required on the implementation.

It was not clear whether Hamas’s statement meant that he had accepted a 60 -day ceasefire proposal from US President Donald Trump.

Hamas is demanding guarantee that the initial Trus will take to the total end of the war, now about 21 months old. Trump is working hard to reach a deal and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is about to visit the White House next week to discuss a deal.

Hamas’s statement occurred as Israeli an airstrikes, killing 15 Palestinians in Gaza early Friday, while a hospital said 20 people were killed in firing seeking help.

The United Nations Human Rights Office said it had tried to help 613 Palestinians killed within a month in Gaza.

Most were killed while trying to reach the food distribution points run by an Israeli -backed American organization, while others were waiting for the support trucks associated with the United Nations or other human organizations.

Continue Reading

Trending